Don't worry, I'm sure Science has everything else right.
(if you are new here, that was sarcasm)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Subscribe Now
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(137)
-
▼
August
(20)
- Best Video Ever Featuring a Dancing Dog
- Foxtrot Win
- Asteroid Discovery
- Babies + Mustaches = Awesome
- The Force is Strong With This One
- Best Wipeout, er, Wipeouts
- How Does This Kid Live? [car wreck]
- Ghosting
- Worst. Cover. Ever.
- Windows OneStop
- Macy Gray covers Arcade Fire, Head Explodes
- Hello, Ladies
- I love you, Internet: Marching Band + Bed Intruder
- Lady freaks out when McDonalds doesn't have any ch...
- ASL "My Humps" is better than actual Black Eyed Peas
- It's Like A Moral Puzzle
- Dude.
- First Pluto, Now This?!
- Finally: A Passion For Beards
- Inception: The Mashup
-
▼
August
(20)
Pluto IS still a planet. Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion, and most are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. One reason the IAU definition makes no sense is it says dwarf planets are not planets at all! That is like saying a grizzly bear is not a bear, and it is inconsistent with the use of the term “dwarf” in astronomy, where dwarf stars are still stars, and dwarf galaxies are still galaxies. Also, the IAU definition classifies objects solely by where they are while ignoring what they are. If Earth were in Pluto’s orbit, according to the IAU definition, it would not be a planet either. A definition that takes the same object and makes it a planet in one location and not a planet in another is essentially useless. Pluto is a planet because it is spherical, meaning it is large enough to be pulled into a round shape by its own gravity--a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium and characteristic of planets, not of shapeless asteroids held together by chemical bonds. These reasons are why many astronomers, lay people, and educators are either ignoring the demotion entirely or working to get it overturned.
ReplyDelete